Having trouble seeing this email? Please see the online version
Non-examination Assessment (NEA) and AI use

21 April 2026
Dear colleague,

Non-examination Assessment (NEA) and AI use

Shortly, your centre will be required to submit the marks for the Non-examination Assessment (NEA) components of your qualifications for this summer series.  

Please remind staff of the importance of checking that candidates have not misused artificial intelligence (AI) tools. AI-generated or AI-assisted content must be clearly acknowledged. This includes confirming the tool used, the version, the dates used, and retaining screenshots of prompts and outputs for submission with the work.  

Strong centre policies and staff training are key to helping candidates understand appropriate use of AI and to avoid AI misuse. AI misuse is a form of malpractice which can result in sanctions being imposed on candidates, including disqualification.


Authentication checks during NEA delivery 

As part of NEA delivery, centres should consider building in the following authentication steps: 
  • teachers/assessors having regular touch points with students regarding their work
  • teachers/assessors being familiar with each candidate’s skills and understanding of the subject
  • retaining copies of authenticated candidate work, for review in the event of any authenticity concerns coming to light
  • teachers/assessors discussing work with candidates, to be assured they can explain decisions made, research undertaken, etc
  • use of AI-detection and plagiarism software once work has been submitted.

Building confidence in spotting AI use  

It is important that teachers and assessors are familiar with AI tools and their outputs. A useful exercise is to experiment using AI tools to generate outputs using the task prompts for NEA or an EPQ. This will give an idea of how AI-generated responses might look, and research shows that people who have practised using AI to generate content are much better able to detect it. 


Updated authentication forms

Our authentication forms have been updated to include references to the appropriate use of AI, for both candidates and assessors. Centres must have checks in place both before and after these forms are signed.  

Where issues are identified before submission, these can be resolved internally. However, anything identified after submission must be reported as suspected malpractice by: 

Marking   

Teachers/assessors are reminded that they must not use AI tools as the sole or primary means of marking candidates’ work.

Teachers must:
  • review all the work in its entirety and
  • determine the mark it warrants, regardless of the outcomes of an AI tool.
The assessor remains responsible for the mark/grade awarded. 


Further guidance and support 

You can find more detailed information below: 
We’ve also published subject level guidance on using AI at the following links:

Need more support? 

If you have any queries about this correspondence, or further questions about NEA and AI use, please do not hesitate to contact us via our
Customer Support Portal and we will be very happy to assist you.


With best wishes,

Lee Seiler
Head of Assessment, UK 

Pearson Customer Services

The Lighthouse, Manchester, M50 3BF

Unsubscribe